WANT TO GO OUT FOR

a outing, a tour ,a picnic, check for discount coupons on FREE GIFTS TO HOME before buying a package. A tour package of Rs. 35000 costs only Rs. 12000 after applying the discount coupon code. We don't sell tour packages but still can be of some help.

WANT TO RECHARGE YOUR

Mobile or DTH, please check the offer on FREEGIFTS TO HOME before doing it through some other medium. A recharge of Rs. 20 costs only Rs. 12 after application of Discount Coupon provided on these site.We don't sell recharges but still can be of some help

WANT TO BUY

a laptop, desktop, or may be some electronic product. Try the offer on FREE GIFTS TO HOME before buying it from any other site or place. A 16 GB pendrive of Rs. 900 costs only Rs. 349 after application of Discount Coupon.We don't sell PEN DRIVE but still can be of some help

WANT TO ORDER

A health drink, a medicine, a health product. Check for Discount coupon code on FREE GIFTS TO HOME before ordering it from anywhere else. A 1 kg Dabur Chawanprash of Rs. 240 costs only Rs. 140 after application of Discount Code.We don't sell Chawanprash but still can be of some help

WANT TO TRY

A new dress, t-shirt, top or jeans. Check for the free trial offers of different brands on FREE GIFTS TO HOME before buying it from anywhere else. Most of the branded products offers free trial for new customers.We don't Endorse any brand but still can be of some help

Saturday, February 9, 2013

MONOPOLY GAME REPLACES IRON WITH CAT: WHY THIS MIGHT DESTROY FRIENDSHIPS


Monopoly - Cat
It turns out, the Internet was right — people like cats.
Some people, anyway. Historically, the issue of feline affection is more divisive than most political elections. But enough people are on the tabby bandwagon to have voted the domestic silvestris into a revered community: Monopoly pieces. Last month, Hasbro opened a public vote to decide which of its original pawns would be ousted, and which of a set of five candidates would be brought on board (pun excessively intended). The results, as of Wednesday morning, have named the catas Monopoly's newest addition — beating out a robot (with a mustache!), a diamond ring, a guitar, and a helicopter.
But, more importantly, our focus shifts to the retired veteran: the iron, which is losings its spot among its longtime colleagues (the Scottie dog, the racecar, the top hat, the boot, the battleship, the wheelbarrow, and the thimble — perish the thought that our dear pitted needle safeguard be doomed to oblivion).
For many, the dismissal of the iron marks celebration, highlighting a new, progressive attitude inhabited by the board game — in fact, #LiberalMonopolyPieces began trending on Twitter when the change was announced. But as the iron is cast into the fire, we must look toward a new era of Monopoly. One for which we might not be adequately prepared.
Monopoly - IronMonopoly serves now as the perfect communion for any diverse family or clique. Suggestions to play are met with a universal, "Yeah, okay," during middle school sleepover parties or winter getaways when everybody is too tired to go skiing. Everybody's fine with it, because it has something for everybody. Not the gameplay, necessarily — only your a**hole friend Troy, whoalways wins despite the fact that he was a freakin' fine arts major, seems to actually be having fun — but the pieces. More so than your choice of favorite ice cream flavor, summer song, or Ninja Turtle is your go-to Monopoly piece wholly telling of your character.
The Scottie Dog: You're playful, the heart and soul of the group, more interested in a whimsical adventure around Atlantic City than in any cold-hearted buy-and-sell nonsense.
The Racecar: You're ambitious, the cutthroat go-getter, the one who'll probably take the victory via any means necessary (and brandish your company with shame as a result).
The Top Hat: You're wry, a trickster of sorts, whose skills in Monopoly come from mindgames and a probing understanding of your weak-willed cohorts' fragile psyches.
The Boot: You're brutish and determined, but honest to a fault — you'll vie for the win with hard-work and dedication, rather than deceit and manipulation.
The Battleship: You're wrathful, tortured, haunted. You're not out to win, but you are out to make sure your sworn enemy (everybody hasone in their group of friends) loses, and you'll team up with racecars and top hats alike to take down that nefarious jackass you so despise.
The Wheelbarrow: You don't really know what's going on. You're pretty drunk.
The Thimble: You're weird, and everybody loves you for it. Except maybe battleship, whom might want you dead.
And then there was the iron — the compassionate sort with a clean head on his or her shoulders, one to level the playing field when racecar sped ahead (for the good of the group), one who kept battleship's warfare in check, one who enabled Scottie dog's childlike yelps and scampers, one who held wheelbarrow's hair back during mid-game vomit fits. But now, iron is gone... and we have cat.
And we have to wonder what this might do to the group dynamic. Can those likely to opt for cat uphold the responsibilities of iron's good nature? Or will cat-choosers, like the featured mammal itself, instead adopt their own brand of cunning, duplicitous, antisocial gameplay (I'm a dog person, sue me), thrusting the entire well-manufactured harmony of Monopoly into chaos?
Fear for your lives, slumber party-goers and cabin vacationers. What was once a marginally fun pastime might now erupt in Armageddon. And here I always thought it'd be Don't Wake Daddy that'd be our undoing...

GRAMMYS’ STRICT NEW DRESS CODE: BUTTS & SIDEBOOB BANNED, GUYS’ NIPPLES OKAY


Pink Naked Grammys
America, land of the free... unless you plan on showing up to the2013 Grammys in a sheer dress that hugs your curves.
CBS standards and practicesjust sent out an email to those appearing on the televised portion of the Grammys this Sunday, asking them to adhere to a strict dress code, according toDeadline. And the guidelines are a tad puritanical. Nay, very puritanical, especially for an awards show that is famous for pushing the envelope compared to the season's stuffier award shows. Hell, Beyoncé’s Super Bowl halftime outfitprobably wouldn’t even make the cut. Per the email, it seems that the ladies are the only ones whose wardrobe is under attack — except for that part about “puffy” nether regions, which one can only assume refers to the potential appearance of a male bulge. The email reads:
"CBS Program Practices advises that all talent appearing on camera please adhere to Network policy concerning wardrobe.
Please be sure that buttocks and female breasts are adequately covered. Thong type costumes are problematic. Please avoid exposing bare fleshy under curves of the buttocks and buttock crack. Bare sides or under curvature of the breasts is also problematic. Please avoid sheer see-through clothing that could possibly expose female breast nipples. Please be sure the genital region is adequately covered so that there is no visible 'puffy' bare skin exposure. Please avoid commercial identification of actual brand name products on T-shirts. Foreign language on wardrobe will need to be cleared. OBSCENITY OR PARTIALLY SEEN OBSCENITY ON WARDROBE IS UNACCEPTABLE FOR BROADCAST. This as well, pertains to audience members that appear on camera. Finally, The Network requests that any organized cause visibly spelled out on talent’s wardrobe be avoided. This would include lapel pins or any other form of accessory."
Got that, music industry mavens? Keep it in your pants. And under wraps. And hidden from even hinted view.
In case this memo is just a little too much to take, what with its uses of “be sure,” “avoid,” and “female breast nipples,” we’ve got a handy dandy picture guide for attendees at the 55th Grammys. This is a classy affair. Save your scandalmakers for the Oscars this year, you rambunctious ruffians — they love that sort of thing at that annual s**tshow.
Don’t: Show off your “puffy” nethers
Just what is a puffy crotchal region? That’s something CBS will never tell. Just keep everything, junk or lady parts, hidden well inside your chosen wardrobe. If it can be considered billowy, bloated, bulgy, distented, enlarged, or enflamed, we shouldn’t see it. Kinda rules out Lady Gaga’s entire set of dancers from her performance of “Born This Way” in 2010. That disturbing egg costume and material that resembles prophylactics? Totally okay.
Lady Gaga Born This Way Grammys
Don’t: “Thong type costumes are problematic”
Sorry, Pink’s mind-blowingly gorgeous 2010 Grammys performance. You’re too slutty for the new Grammys. Art? Psh. Cover up your buns, lady.
Pink grammys 2010
Don’t: Show the “bare fleshy under curves of the buttocks and buttock crack”
Sorry, Rihanna’s incredibly memorable 2011 super-sheer Grammys dress. Between the lines of puffy (but not that kind of puffy) tulle we could see every curve on that girl’s body: buttocks, breasts, and belly button. This year, don’t even think about it, RiRi.
Rihanna sheer Grammys Dress 2011
Don’t: Wear clothing that may “expose female breast nipples” or “bare sides or under curvature of the breasts”
Ah, yes. The female breast nipples, distant cousin of the male pectoral nipples and the Mark Wahlberg nubbin (or more affectionately, the third male pectoral nipple). No sideboob either. (But we love sideboob!) Well, CBS powers that be, keep in mind that your rule would take out the most famous Grammys dress of all time: Jennifer Lopez’s sheer, side (and bottom) boob exposing 2000 green Versace gown.
JenniferLopez grammy dress 2000
Do: Wear Sheer Shirts Exposing Male Breast Nipples
Okay, they’re pectoral nipples, but still. This is okay, but JLo’s sideboob is banned? That’s ourMerica, it seems.
Yoko Ono Opening Ceremony Mesh Shirt
Do: Avoid This Whole NSFG (Not Safe For Grammys) Nonsense Altogether
While the dudes are all wearing mesh shirts and crotch-grab pants, play it safe ladies. Hide your butt curvature, sideboob, female breast nipples, and buttock crack so well we start to think they might not actually exist.
Maggie Smith Dowager Countess

FIVE WAYS TO GET RID OF CHRIS BROWN FOREVER


chris brown is terrible
Universal scourge Chris Brown is going to court today. No, it's not for punching Frank Ocean, throwing a bottle at Drake, beating upRihanna, or even acting like a total jerk to national treasure (and cancer survivor!) Robin Roberts. It's because he didn't complete his community service for a 2009 assault conviction. In fact, Brown lied and told the court he was picking up trash on the highway when he was really on board a private jet to Cancun. Class act, this one.
God, I just wish that Easy Breezy Beautiful Cover Girl would go away forever, don't you? But how can we do it? How can we get rid of this homophobic, misogynistic jerkface once and for all? Here are a couple of ideas.
Ignore Him: I know this seems stupid to say in an article all about him, but maybe we should just listen to our mother's advice and ignore the thing that makes us crazy. Maybe then it will go away! But not only does the media have to cooperate but so do you. If we stop buying his songs, going to his concerts, watching his YouTube videos, and following his every last felonious movie, he will disappear like the fog when the sun comes out. After all, if he stops making money no one will deal with all the crap that goes along with hiring him.
Call Him Out: Sure, telling Chris Brown he is a jerk to his face might not be such a great idea (unless you like going to the emergency room for being punched in the head), but we should let everyone who associates with him know that, because he's there, we won't be tuning in. When he performs at the VMAs, tell MTV you'll be watching cat GIFs on the Internet instead. When he comes to your local concert venue, show up and protest. Maybe if enough of us make life a living hell for everyone in the Brown-isphere, then they'll stop giving him jobs.
Send Him to Jail: This goes out to you, Frank Ocean. You should have pressed charges. You should have sent him to jail or back on probation or something. The problem with Chris Brown is that no one will teach him a lesson so he never learns. Ocean really missed his chance. Maybe this community service thing will be enough to get Brown in the clink. I sure hope so. Look at how well going to jail rehabilitated Lindsay Lohan. Oh wait...
Alien Abduction: Someone get Mulder on the phone and see if he can call up one of those little green men that he's so fond of to swoop down in their flying saucer and take this clown to outer space, or maybe to meet the Killer Klowns from Outer Space. If he stays on this planet there is always the sad likelihood that he'll eventually have a comeback and then we'll have to deal with all of this nonsense all over again. And from space he wouldn't even be able to hear us scream... with delight that he is gone.
Get Him to Change: Haha. Yeah. That seems likely.

CIRQUE DU SOLEIL TEAMS UP WITH SKRILLEX FOR EDM LAS VEGAS NIGHTCLUB


LIGHT_Nightclub
Cirque Du Soleil has just signed Skrillex as well as other big-name DJs to do residencies at its new Las Vegas nightclub. LIGHT Nightclubopens April 26 at the Mandalay Bay and will feature theatrical elements not normally found in a club but which are par for the course at a Cirque Du Soleil or Electronic Dance Music show, like dangling contortionists and complicated light shows.
"The LIGHT Skrillex show is going to be only in Vegas," Skrillex says. "I want it be distinct to the LIGHT club because the configuration is so customizable, it's f***ing crazy. That's the thing about the club, too: they can do anything, so it's how you maximize the dynamic of a great show with all their f***ing bells and whistles and all of their budgets and resources to do anything."
Other DJs who have joined the Grammy-winning dubstep artist in signing up with the club for residencies are Sebastian Ingrosso, Alesso, Baauer, and Zedd, who calls LIGHT “a theater play with music.” Each artist's residency will incorporate all new lights, acrobats, music, and change up the overall experience. Ingrosso, who is touring with his group Swedish House Mafia one last time before the group breaks up for good, is looking forward to taking his solo career back to the club dance floor.
"Production on dance shows has been escalating for a long time now. Swedish House Mafia shows have been something we build for months before a tour," he says. "But this is putting the production layers back where this all began: the club dance floor. This isn't a huge arena, this is a club, and the vibe in a club is very different and special. This isn't escalating up, this is it taking it back to the dance floor and we'll all see where it takes us and enjoy it."
EDM has always been a part of the Las Vegas scene, with big name DJs playing sets at all the nightclubs on a regular basis, but now EDM fans have a permanent place to frequent on the strip. With residencies from some of the biggest names in the industry, EDM can now add Vegas to the list of places it has infiltrated, along with TV (DJ Steve Aoki is guest starring as himself on an episode of The CW's Arrow), the radio (Swedish House Mafia's "Don't You Worry Child" is one of many EDM songs featured in the Top 40 hits), movies (Project X was basically one long EDM music video), and the music industry itself (more and more EDM artists have been nominated for Grammys and other music stars are collaborating with more EDM artists). EDM world domination is almost complete. You've been warned.

WHO SHOULD TAYLOR SWIFT BRING AS HER DATE TO THE GRAMMY AWARDS?


Taylor Swift
Life is hard if your name is Taylor Swift. Because being a Taylor Swift means that you're perpetually lovelorn and that, immediately upon each break up you endure, a wise old crone chains you to a recording studio and forces you to sing for your supper (and to help pay her bills — Time Warner is expensive!). Oh, and you have to sing for your fans. And that cat of yours named after a Grey's Anatomy whiner. So it's no surprise that Swift is constantly seen out and about, dating whichever male celebrity crosses her path. She doesn't want to live her life out through songs, you guys! They're crazy-popular, Grammy-nominated songs that win all of the awards, sure, but they're also still a product of her failings as a woman who needs a man to be happy, duh.
With the Grammy Awards only a few days away (Sunday), and Swifty nominated thrice herself, it seems logical that she'd want a dude by her side to share in the magical and all-too-surprising moment of winning a golden gramophone on music's biggest (and increasingly less-relevant) night. So we've taken a look at her past dating history and figured if anyone knows who this perky princess of country music should date, it's definitely a 27-year-old writer on the Internet. So without further ado, we present, for your consideration, Taylor Swift's potential dates for the Grammy Awards.
Nicholas Hoult
ALT
He's a hot Hollywood commodity and recently single. This one is definitely on Swifty's radar, we're sure. Hope her BFF Jennifer Lawrence doesn't live by the ovaries before brovaries code.
Emblem3
ALT
After dating Harry Styles from One Direction, dating an entire boyband at the same time feels like the next logical step. That'll really show that wee meat pie who's boss. (Meat pies are super-British, right?)
Justin Bieber
ALT
Well, he wasn't nominated, but he'll be all anyone talks about if you bring him! Plus, f**king with beliebers is sort of fun, admit it!
The Wanted's Max George
ALT
Just to show Lindsay who's boss. Plus, everybody knows you can always trust a man with two first names.
Adam Levine
ALT
Is this what a "rebound from John Mayer" looks like?
Russell Brand
ALT
...or is THIS what a "rebound from John Mayer" looks like?
Tom Cruise
ALT
I mean, Scientology is looking for its new queen...
Ryan Lochte
ALT
Ryan Lochte may actually be Taylor Swift's soulmate.
Sam Fox
ALT
Sorry, Michael J. You know she's going to do it.
So who would YOU pick for Taylor Swift to bring as her date? Pick your favorite in the poll below, and sound off in the comments on someone we may have missed!
<a href="http://polldaddy.com/poll/6884141/">Who Should Be Taylor Swift's Date to the Grammy Awards?</a>


NEWTOWN CHOIR TO PERFORM DURING GRAMMYS RED CARPET: LET THE KIDS BE KIDS


sandy hook chorus performs at grammys
It's been 54 days since 26 people lost their lives to a disturbed shooter who opened fire in the halls of Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. In the days immediately following the attack, America mournedPresident Obama gave a stirring, emotional speech (and shed a few tears of his own), the NFL observed a moment of silence before each of its weekend games, and the normally raucous Saturday Night Live solemnly showed its remorse with a children's choir singing "Silent Night." But now, nearly two months later, the memory of that tragic day is kept alive by trotting the survivors out for us all to gawk at. During a time when these children should start to get back to old routines and rebuild a sense of normalcy in their lives, they are continuously shoved in the spotlight.
The chorus from Sandy Hook Elementary first performed alongsideJennifer Hudson at the Super Bowl, and now, the kids will sing as part of E!'s Live From the Red Carpet Grammys pre-show. E! reports that a group of 21 children from Newtown (only some of whom attend Sandy Hook) will be broadcast live via satellite from their Connecticut locale, singing Carly Rae Jepsen's "Call Me Maybe." They will then be interviewed by Ryan Seacrest, about what one can only imagine. These children are now celebrities because they witnessed a tragedy, and that juxtaposition is more than a little unsettling. 
Before the kids' big Super Bowl debut, Erin Nikitchyuk, a parent of one of the children, summed up the contradictory feelings the performance stirred in her and many by telling CBS, "It’s hard to balance the thought that we’re being rewarded for the tragedies of those days, but as a friend of mine said, we're layering good experiences on top of the bad experiences we’ve had with our kids and I think they are healing." Of course she's right. And music, it seems, has been particularly instrumental in helping the children to heal.
Last month, the same chorus that will be showcased on E! recorded a version of "Over the Rainbow" with singer-songwriter Ingrid Michaelson, which is now available for purchase on iTunes (the proceeds for all sales will go to the United Way of Western Connecticut and the Newtown Youth Academy). The children have since performed the song on ABC's Good Morning America and at a benefit concert. The performance on Grammys night, at first glance, seems to be an extension of this musical release.
Newtown teacher Sabrina Post agrees. Speaking of the choir appearances, she told the AP, "This opportunity to do something positive lets the kids know that although a lot of things happen in our world that are not pleasant, like this that happened with us in Newtown, there are many giving people and wonderful things that can come out of life, so don't get discouraged," she said. "It teaches them to use their gifts to work through things." This sentiment is, again, admirable.
Tim Hayes, co-producer of the "Over the Rainbow" recording, adds his voice to the chorus of supporters. He tells the AP, "We know the kids involved have had a wonderful experience, but we think this chapter is now done, and we want these kids to get back to being kids." And here, finally, we arrive at the heart of the matter: These kids need to get back to being kids.
While the morning show appearances and New Orleans excursions have surely been exciting for the children, they have prevented the kids from returning to their normal lives. On Dec. 14, the lives of these children changed drastically. Not only did the day's events impact the students emotionally — grammar-school-aged kids were suddenly confronted with a grief many adults are fortunate enough to have never experienced — but also tangibly, on a day-to-day level, when these kids were forced out of their school and in front of national news cameras. How can parents begin to help their children understand that life will one day be able to return to normal if that restoration is continuously delayed? Even if that delay is caused by fun things.
But the blame here, of course, doesn't lie with the Newtown families. (What parent doesn't want their grieving child to experience the exhilaration of the Super Bowl or the Grammy Awards? Who wouldn't, like Nikitchyuk says, want to layer happy memories over the terrifying ones?) It is the network's decision to use the chorus as a ratings magnet that is so deplorable. E! knows that viewers will tune in to watch the kids; when the satellite to Connecticut heats up, Grammy red carpet viewers will undoubtedly switch from CBS to E!. And that is exploitive.
Because, you see, the "Call Me Maybe" performance isn't really about the kids. It's not about healing, it's not about happy memories, it's not about music. It's about ratings. For E!, the rest are all just excuses and happy side effects. So let's turn off the cameras, give Newtown some room to breathe, and let these kids get back to being kids. 

JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE’S '20/20' ALBUM COVER IS A SEXY TRIP TO THE OPTOMETRIST — PIC


Justin Timberlake Album Cover 20/20 Experience
Justin Timberlake hasn't yet released word of a world tour like his fellow musical hot topic Beyonce, but he's got her beat in one very visual endeavor: he just unveiled the cover his new album The 20/20 Experience via Twitter. And he's taking the vision concept pretty seriously.
The piece of ophthalmic equipment, which I've just learned (thanks to the wonder of Google) is called a Phoropter, hides JT's wonderful visage, acting as an even greater tease of the contents inside. Still, the album is missing a little something. It's got the killer bowtie and the drama of an album title as hubristic as The 20/20 Experience (and an experience it had better be, Mr. Timberlake), but it all feels a little disappointing.Justified gave us a view of Timberlake straight on, staring right into our twitterpated, *NSYNC-loving souls. FutureSex/LoveSounds delivered a dangerous(ish) look at Timberlake's more mature, sexier side, placing him in stark relief against a white background. Here, he's getting his eyes checked. But damnit, if he doesn't look dapper doing it! Much like the feeling we got after listening to "Suit and Tie" (which was great, but not nearly as earth-shattering as the first time we heard "SexyBack"), we're left wondering, "Now what?"
Luckily, there's a bit more. Timberlake also released the track list from the album, meaning we're now free to wonder whether "Spaceship Coupe" is a new dance track or an existential spacey ballad. Is "That Girl" the followup to "Damn, Girl"? (We really loved that song in spite of ourselves.) The tantalizing titles are as follows:"Pusher Love Girl"
"Suit & Tie"
"Don't Hold the Wall"
"Strawberry Bubblegum"
"Tunnel Vision"
"Spaceship Coupe"
"That Girl"
"Let the Groove Get In"
"Mirrors"
Of course, none of those questions will be answered until JT either lets us all hungrily gobble up the album on its planned release date, March 19, or should he happen to pull a FutureSex/LoveSounds, and embark on a miniature club tour again, playing his new songs for small gatherings of rabid fans who've never heard the tracks before. Either way is fine, just do the damn thing, Justin.

THE BILLBOARD BEATS: WILL BRITNEY SPEARS STEAL THE TOP SPOT?


britney spears
All eyes are on Britney Spears and will.i.am this week. Their single "Scream & Shout" has moved it's way up to No. 3 on Billboard's Hot 100 Chart. Last week, it was stuck at No. 5.
But the duo shouldn't get too excited because it looks like it's going to be tough to move up any higher. Macklemore and Ryan Lewis' "Thrift Shop" is holding onto No. 1 for its third week in a row, and Bruno Mars' "Locked Out of Heaven" doesn't seem to want to leave the No. 2 spot.
Spears and will.i.am "gotta turn the s**t up" if they want to make it to No. 1.
Check out the other songs that made it to the Top 10 this week.
The Top 10 Songs of Billboard.com's Hot 100 Chart:
1. "Thrift Shop" by Macklemore and Ryan Lewis, Featuring Wanz
Peak Position: 1
Last Week's Position: 1
Weeks on Chart: 18
2. "Locked Out of Heaven" by Bruno Mars
Peak Position: 1
Last Week's Position: 2
Weeks on Chart: 18
3. "Scream & Shout" by will.i.am & Britney Spears
Peak Position: 3
Last Week's Position: 5
Weeks on Chart: 10
4. "Ho Hey" by The Lumineers
Peak Position: 3
Last Week's Position: 3
Weeks on Chart: 35
5. "I Knew You Were Trouble." by Taylor Swift
Peak Position: 2
Last Week's Position: 4
Weeks on Chart: 16
6. "Don't You Worry Child" by Swedish House Mafia, Featuring John Martin
Peak Position: 6
Last Week's Position: 6
Weeks on Chart: 20
7. "Beauty And A Beat" by Justin Bieber, Featuring Nicki Minaj
Peak Position: 5
Last Week's Position: 7
Weeks on Chart: 17
8. "F**kin Problems" by A$AP Rocky, Featuring Drake, 2 Chainz, and Kendrick Lamar
Peak Position: 8
Last Week's Position: 10
Weeks on Chart: 14
9. "Try" by P!nk
Peak Position: 9
Last Week's Position: 11
Weeks on Chart: 15
10. "Sweet Nothing" by Calvin Harris, Featuring Florence Welch
Peak Position: 10
Last Week's Position: 14
Weeks on Chart: 13
Follow Lindsey on Twitter @LDiMat.

LENA DUNHAM SAYS SHE VOTED, BROOKLYN SAYS SHE DIDN'T — WHO DO WE BELIEVE?


Lena Dunham
Even more polarizing than the policies of President Obama is the young writer/actress who, as it turns out, might not have voted for him: Lena Dunham, whose 2012 breakthrough into the public consciousness, via her HBO series Girls, has earned her unwavering idolatry from many and untempered scorn from others. Those in the latter camp will take this new opportunity to chomp at the multi-hyphenate’s reputation — outspoken advocate for Obama and pro-voting activist Dunham is reported, by Room Eight’s Gatemouth blog, to not have voted in the 2012 presidential election.
The news broke Wednesday night, exactly three months after the election. Gatemouth released the following declaration:
I can now report that according to New York City’s voter file, a Lena Dunham registered in Brooklyn did not vote in the 2012 general election or in any local elections since she moved from her prior address in Tribeca.But all politically enthused Dunham fans who feel betrayed by this news shouldn't purge their DVR of Girls episodes just yet — a rep for the 26-year-old star has confirmed to Hollywood that "Lena [Dunham] voted in the 2012 presidential election."
So who do we believe? It's pretty clear that we'll all stick to our camps: Dunham lovers will take the actress' word for it, and perhaps enjoy some celebratory shower cake, while those who find her work offensive will just use this latest rumor as another brick in their brownstone of opposition. But realists of either allegiance have to admit to the probability of any region's voting records not being quite up to snuff.
Think about the last time you voted: hordes of confused citizens congregated in dilapidated middle schools under the "watchful eye" of equally confused (and comically on-in-years) station delegates, shuffling off to marginally functioning computers to contribute to the most important decision in our country's operation. And as far as absentee ballots go... well, we're actually not to sure where absentee ballots go. So perhaps Brooklyn doesn't have a vote on file for one Lena Dunham... but that hardly means she didn't actually vote.
And even if she didn't vote, she probably had a pretty good reason. I think there was an SVU marathon on that day...

POLITICAL ATTACK AD REAMS ASHLEY JUDD, WHO IS NOT ACTUALLY RUNNING FOR SENATE YET


ashley judd attack ad
Conservatives in Kentucky apparently can’t resist the lure of Hollywood. Super PAC American Crossroads is running a sarcastic attack ad against actress and activist Ashley Judd, who’s merely considering a 2014 challenge to Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. The ad features video clips (which, for some reason, are hanging on a tree — is that a Kentucky thing?) of Judd saying stuff like, “Obamacare has done so much for us,” and “I got radical." Given that the election isn’t until next year, and given that she is not even close to running yet, only two explanations remain for this: 1. They’re genuinely scared of Judd as a challenger, despite the state’s super-conservative voter base; or 2. They thought they’d get mileage out of mocking Hollywood liberals, regardless of whether she ever runs.
Or maybe there’s a third explanation: They were so enamored of their idea for this ad that they wanted to do it as soon as possible — just in case she doesn’t run. No matter your political affiliation, you must admit it’s a pretty solid ad for an anti-Obama, Republican-drenched state. Of course, if you’re a liberal, this will just make you want to vote for Judd, or, if you’re not in Kentucky, maybe even move to Kentucky to help her campaign. And certainly, at the very least, it raises massive awareness of her as a possible candidate, which she acknowledged in a statement released by her publicist: “Ashley thanks Senator McConnell, Karl Rove, and their negative allies for all the attention as she considers her future political plans, although a decision hasn’t been made yet.” Check the ad out here:
Hollywood.com correspondent Jennifer Keishin Armstrong is the author of two forthcoming books, Sexy Feminism (due out in March) and Mary and Lou and Rhoda and Ted, a history of The Mary Tyler Moore Show (due out in May). For more information visitJenniferKArmstrong.com.

ANYONE ELSE OFFENDED BY MARVEL AND HYPERION'S SHE-HULK AND ROGUE ROMANCE NOVELS?


The She-Hulk DiariesMarvel Comics and Hyperion are teaming up to give something to the ladies. Or, at least, what they thinkwe want — if, of course, the ladies that read comic books were stereotypes and cellophane versions of real human women. It's making us angry — and you won't like us when we're angry.
The two announced a deal Thursday to publish two action/adventure romance novels about popular female superheroes She-Hulk and Rogue. The only problem is — Sigh. Why do they make it so easy for me? — that these books sound fairly offensive, as if they were "OK'd" by someone who maybe hasn't ever met a modern woman before. (And no, I didn't make the virgin joke, because that's petty, lazy, and just another way society messes with everything and shames people for no good reason. But I digress!)
The novels purport to "showcase strong, smart heroines," but seemingly relegate their stories to "seeking happiness and love" as if those are the only two things women are programmed to care about, ever. Everyone knows women also care about fashion and making pies! So that's like four things. Give us some credit! Gosh.
Here's an unpopular opinion, comic book industry: Why don't we first work on making our female superheroes more than just spandex-tinged boobholders meant to tantalize and frustrate the predominately male audience that reads them? I don't think anyone would ever accuse the industry and its fans of being super feminists.
How about trying to bring females into the fold as equals? Say, by — oh, I don't know — removing a bit of the misogyny that's followed them for so long? Women don't need The She-Hulk Diaries. Because 1) the name is a rip-off of so many other trite and cliched things out there right now, 2) green lipstick, seriously?, and 3) If you fix your root problem, you might actually convince women that reading the source material itself is worthwhile. You know, actual comic books? Or are some executives out there afraid that, by creating realistic portrayals of women, they'll lose the coveted mouthbreather demographic?
As a woman, it feels like a proverbial pat on the head. As if the comic book industry is placating those among us demanding better portrayals of women. And Hyperion Editor-in-Chief Elisabeth Dyssegaard isn't helping matters much either when she is quoted as saying, "Marvel has had tremendous success with recent hit movies and we think it’s a great time to explore what happens to super heroines when they are dropped into traditional women’s novels." Just repeated that last line in your head: "traditional women's novels." There isn't enough blank space on the Internet for me to get into that one.
Ruwan Jayatilleke of Marvel Entertainment seems to agree with Dyssegaard (somehow), explaining that, "it’s exciting to see Hyperion bring two of our most beloved female super heroes, Rogue and She-Hulk, to life in ways you’ve never seen before. Whether you’re a long time fan of Marvel or new to our Super Heroes, these novels deliver exciting stories that will capture your imagination." But only if your imagination dreams in cherubs and unrealistic romantical expectations, natch! What about giving little girls the same sort of role models as the little boys have in Spider-Man, Iron Man, Batman, Hulk, Captain America, Superman, and the like? Don't they deserve that, too?
The books purport to discuss both love and battling cosmic evil, but the descriptions of the books seem to focus way more on the former than the latter. The She-Hulk Diaries — the less-offensive sounding of the two (I know! Don't get us started on that book cover) — is said to focus on Jennifer Walters, a.k.a. She-Hulk, and her quest to balance work and super villains all while "trying to navigate the dating world to find a Mr. Right who might not mind a sometimes-very big and green girlfriend." 
Rogue Touch centers on the X-Men heroine who absorbs powers through touch. After accidentally putting her boyfriend in a coma (Silly ladies! They can never control their emotions, let alone their superpowers!), Rogue runs away from home, where she then meets the "handsome and otherworldly James and sparks fly." Oh no! Poor Rogue is stuck between two dudes! And she has superpowers that, even though she's lived with them from birth, she can't seem to control! Life for a woman is complicated! But only in the silly, trivial ways, amirite?
Call me crazy, but no one was all that excited by the film I Don't Know How She Does It, so something tells me they won't be lining up for this stuff, either. No matter how many She-Hulk smashes might occur.
The condescension in the idea alone — that there even needs to be a separate set of books, called "traditional women's novels" at that! (hoo child, don't get me started on that one) — may end up being more offensive than the books themselves. (One should always hope for the best.) But if the comic book industry thinks that this is the answer to their woman problem, well, they're worse off than we originally imagined.
What do you think about Marvel's new female-fronted endeavor? Let us know in the comments!

FIRST PICS! SEE GISELE BUNDCHEN'S CUTE NEW BABY — STILL HATE HER NOW?

gisele bundchen first pics baby vivian
Gisele Bundchen revealed the first photos of her new baby girl Vivian Lake on Facebook Friday.
"Love is everything!!!" the model, 32, wrote in the post accompanying the pic. "Happy Friday, much love to all."
Those cheeks! Those little chubby baby feet! That dress! Bundchen's 9-week-old daughter is adorable, for sure. But is it enough to scrub the supermodel's image clean? 
The Brazilian bombshell has a lot of marks against her: all of those husband-stealing rumors surrounding her hookup with now-husbandTom Brady, her insane quotes about childbirth (it "wasn't painful, not even a little bit,"). And, of course there's her new $20 million LA mega-mansion, which was widely ridiculed several weeks ago for having a moat. A moat.
There's certainly no love lost between her and some other football wives and fans, especially after her famous post-Super Bowl rant when she criticized Brady's teammates: "I can’t believe they dropped the ball so many times."
Yup, the "Yoko Ono" of football hasn't won over many fans outside of the fashion world. But has motherhood softened her? Can you really still hate a lady holding a baby? Tell us in the comments section below: does sweet little Vivian make you like Gisele even a little bit more? 

CAPTION THIS! UNLIKELY PAIR LINDSAY LOHAN AND WOODY ALLEN SAY CHEESE


Lindsay Lohan and Woody Allen at New York Fashion Week
Worlds collided at the amfAR (American Foundation for AIDS Research) New York Gala to Kick Off Fall 2013 Fashion Week at Cipriani Wall Street on Wednesday night when Hollywood's biggest trainwreckLindsay Lohan was spotted cozying up to one of New York's biggest cynics (and Hollywood's greatest minds) Woody Allen.
Shockingly, the two have been seen together before, most notably last May when they stepped out to dinner on the Upper East Side to, according to the New York Post, "chat about her once-promising career."
But the fact that this is a reunion and not a first-time encounter doesn't make the above photo any less ridiculous. The two just look so... glazed and confused. "What could possibly be going on here?" you ask. Well, we have some caption ideas:
* Woody gives Lindsay sage advice: "Take the Money and Run."
* Now introducing, the star of Crimes and Misdemeanors II: House Arrest.
* In one image, Woody Allen has sequelized Celebrity.
* #TooSoon-yi
* What's Up, Tiger LiLo?
"What if Hannah had another, younger sister? Like, one with a coke problem?" Woody wonders.
* Woody always was a fan of The Parent Trap.
* Lindsay is all, "Danny DeVito! I love your work!"
Have a better caption? Share yours in the comments!